Constitutional Law and Artificial Intelligence: Separating Fact from Fiction

We hope you like our essay debunking the myth that AI detectors will reveal that the United States Constitution was drafted by robots.

Here, we examine the background of this misconception, outline the thinking behind it, and offer explanation. Come along as we sort reality from fiction and illuminate the nuanced link between AI and historical writings.

Where Did the Artificial Intelligence Detectors Get Their Wrong Idea?

This misunderstanding originated with the application of AI detectors to the analysis of textual materials, including historical documents like the United States Constitution.

Different algorithms and models are used by these detectors to analyse texts for authorship claims by analysing patterns, language traits, and writing styles.

Making Use of Contemporary Literature to Train AI

present texts and contemporary literature are used to train AI detectors, exposing them to a variety of writing styles typical of the present day.

When used to older documents like the United States Constitution, the detectors may have trouble properly identifying the idiosyncratic language features and writing practises of the time period.

Recognising the Ambiguity

Timeline of Language Change

Language develops through time, and writing styles have changed considerably since the US Constitution was drafted.

The document is written in the style of the late 18th century, which may be different from current styles of writing.

Artificial intelligence detectors that have only been exposed to modern texts may have difficulty understanding the subtleties and complexities of ancient language patterns.

Challenges faced by AI Detectors

AI detectors are able to spot similarities and patterns in texts, but their conclusions are constrained by the information they were taught to recognise.

It’s possible that the detectors lack the background information and context to properly identify the characteristics of historical writings and credit authorship to the correct person.

Explanation and Profound Knowledge

Professional Decoding and Analysis

Historical writings, such as the United States Constitution, require professional examination and interpretation.

Expert humans, such as historians, constitutional scholars, and linguists, can analyse and correctly ascribe authorship of such pivotal texts due to their superior knowledge and contextual understanding.

AI as a Resource, Not a Guru

Artificial intelligence detectors should be seen as resources that can facilitate the processing of massive volumes of text data.

While they can be helpful in many ways and complement the work of human specialists, they should not be used as the only basis for making decisions about text authenticity or historical value.

Conclusion

Due to the detectors’ shortcomings in comprehending historical texts, many people incorrectly assume that they can discern if the US Constitution was authored by AI.

Misinterpretation stems from a number of factors, including the inherent ambiguity of human languages, the inherent biases in training data, and a lack of contextual awareness.

The junction of AI and historical texts may be navigated more clearly and accurately if we value the knowledge of human academics and see AI for what it is: a tool.